CORPORATE MEDIA | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED


CORPORATE MEDIA

Dec 01 10:12

Warmists Give Climategate the Cold Shoulder

Dec 01 10:11

ClimateGate - Hoax of All Time a Global Ponzi Scheme

Dec 01 09:31

CLIMATEGATE - Copenhagen's Collapse

Share:
Dec 01 09:05

Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren involved in unwinding “Climategate” scandal

Obama Science Czar John Holdren is directly involved in CRU’s unfolding Climategate scandal. In fact, according to files released by a CEU hacker or whistleblower, Holdren is involved in what Canada Free Press (CFP) columnist Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball terms “a truculent and nasty manner that provides a brief demonstration of his lack of understanding, commitment on faith and willingness to ridicule and bully people”.

Dec 01 09:04

Uh Oh. Now The NY Times Discusses Bad Science In ClimateGate

Dec 01 08:18

European Climate Exchange chief Patrick Birley defends the carbon trading system

"Why should it be different as a commodity to the way people trade oil or gas?"

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Because oil and gas are useful, while the trading of carbon credits is a manufactured need, with the "carbon credits" literally manufactured out of thin air!

Dec 01 08:16

CLIMATEGATE - Eco barons lead the way

The Green List has unearthed 100 tycoons or wealthy families worth £200m or more who have made either serious investments in green technology and businesses or hefty financial commitments to environmental causes. In total, the Green 100 are worth nearly £267 billion.

This enormous sum demonstrates that many of the world’s richest tycoons and entrepreneurs have embraced environmentalism.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Like I said, there are trillions of dollars on the line here.

And these people didn't get rich by letting a little thing like the truth get in their way!

Dec 01 08:13

CLIMATEGATE - RAMPING UP THE "YOU'RE GONNA DROWN IF YOU DON'T GIVE US YOUR MONEY" BOOGA BOOGA!

Sea levels will rise by twice as much as previously predicted as a result of global warming, an important international study has concluded.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Okay, well since they blew their previous prediction by 100%, how do we know this one didn't wander in the wrong direction?

Obviously, this is a campaign to terrorize the people back into obedience to the global warming cult, and frankly, the Times has shot past "Propaganda" into "looking silly and pathetic."

If there were not so much at stake here, this would be seen as very funny.

Actually, I did succumb to a short burst of laughter on seeing this.

Dec 01 07:43

Global Warming: "Fixing the Climate Data around the Policy"

The results of these high level consultations were forwarded to the Danish government as well as to the governments of participating member states. A so-called summary report for policymakers was drafted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, on behalf the corporate executives participating in the event. This report has very little to do with environmental protection. It largely consists in a profit driven agenda, which uses the global warming consensus as a justification. (

Dec 01 07:39

Media "Distortions"

Webmaster's Commentary: 

With the exception of FOX News, Wall Street Journal, Detroit News, and a few others, the overwhelming reaction of the corporate media to Climategate has been to try to pretend the story does not exist. BBC admitted sitting on the leaked emails and software for over a month!

Here is a quick review of more reasons not to trust ABCNNBBCBS!

Optional Banner: 
WRH Exclusive
Nov 30 21:58

CLIMATEGATE - When scientists behave like bullies

This just in from the Times of London: After the leak of highly embarrassing e-mail messages from the University of East Anglia's influential Climatic Research Unit, CRU has been forced to admit that it dumped "the original raw" climate data used to bolster the case for human-caused global warming, while retaining only the "value-added" - read: massaged - data.

In short, the CRU dumped the scientific data, but archived information that supports its conclusions. "It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years," wrote Times environment editor Jonathan Leake.

Nov 30 21:55

Brit Hume: ClimateGate Suggests Global Warming May Be A Fraud

Fox News's Brit Hume Monday said the growing ClimateGate scandal suggests manmade global warming may be a fraud.

Nov 30 21:34

"Mainstream" media censors economic solutions, Federal Reserve controls economic journals

People with intellectual integrity and moral courage embrace the evidence of “mainstream” media lies of omission and commission regarding US wars and transfer of trillions of dollars to banksters. The evidence linked is objective, independently verifiable, and in broad daylight for anyone and everyone to see.

Nov 30 18:23

Global Warming Supporters In Denial As Climategate Scandal Continues To Fester

The Climategate scandal continues to fester like an infected wound covered with a wet bandage. The mainstream media and global warmists are in denial of the spreading Climategate scandal and trying to move on as if nothing has happened. Left wing pundits deny there is a smoking gun; in spite of smoking gun evidence. Global warming scientists are attacking each other while the UN IPCC chief tells us there is "virtually no possibility" they are wrong.

Nov 30 18:22

Gibbs on Climategate: The science is settled

The data’s in a dumpster and the analysts have been discredited, but the science itself remains pristine, my friends. When asked about Climategate last week, The One’s climate czar literally shrugged it off. Would the head of the UN’s body on global warming fare better?

Nov 30 18:22

Climategate: Follow the Money

Climategate, as readers of these pages know, concerns some of the world's leading climate scientists working in tandem to block freedom of information requests, blackball dissenting scientists, manipulate the peer-review process, and obscure, destroy or massage inconvenient temperature data—facts that were laid bare by last week's disclosure of thousands of emails from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, or CRU.

But the deeper question is why the scientists behaved this way to begin with, especially since the science behind man-made global warming is said to be firmly settled. To answer the question, it helps to turn the alarmists' follow-the-money methods right back at them.

Nov 30 18:21

The Economics of Climate Change

To keep this money flowing, climate scientists needed to keep the fear going. Anything that called into question their most dire predictions of climate catastrophe would put all that funding at risk. On the other hand, the bigger the climate calamity, the more willing governments became to fund global-warming research. Keeping the dissenters on the outside was not simply a matter of academic jealousy. It was in many cases a question of professional survival.

Nov 30 18:08

CBC Audience Relations – “We know all about Climategate”

So I got fed up and I called. Here is my message.

Nov 30 16:45

Global Warming: "Fixing the Climate Data around the Policy"

Nov 30 15:33

White House Brushes Off ClimateGate, Claims Climate Change Is No Longer ‘In Dispute Anymore’

When asked by Fox News’ Major Garrett what the White House thought about the ClimateGate scandal, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs claimed that the existence of climate change was no longer “in dispute anymore.”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Climate change never WAS in dispute. Climate change is what is SUPPOSED to happen.

At issue is the fraud used to manufacture a crisis in order to sell us the solution.

Nov 30 14:41

White House Continues To Ignore ClimateGate

Just days ahead of the pResident’s trip to Hopenhagen to help hammer out some kind of deal that usurps American sovereignty and moola, Robert Gibbs takes a question from Major Garrett about the hacked ClimateGate emails, and totally sidesteps answering it by stating that “…Carol Browner addressed that last week; on the order of several thousand scientists have come to the conclusion that climate change is happening. I don’t think that’s anything that is, quite frankly among most people, in dispute anymore.” Don’t hold your breath waiting for Gibbs or Obama to volunteer that those scientists based their opinions on faked data.

Nov 30 14:34

New World Order/ United Nations/Climategate

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Here is the agenda behind the global warming hoax.

Nov 30 14:00

CLIMATEGATE - Cap and Trade Could Be a Boon to New York

In this turmoil, it may seem hard to imagine a financial market poised to deliver significant growth. However, a rising number of investors and financiers see one in the trading and reduction of carbon. According to financial experts, carbon permits could quickly become the world's largest commodities market, growing to as much as $3 trillion by 2020 from just over $100 billion today. With thousands of firms and energy producers buying and selling permits to emit carbon, transaction fees for exchanges and clearing alone could top nearly half a billion dollars.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

I told you it was all about the money!

Nov 30 13:55

More on Climategate

In my previous post on Climategate I blithely said that nothing in the climate science email dump surprised me much. Having waded more deeply over the weekend I take that back.

The closed-mindedness of these supposed men of science, their willingness to go to any lengths to defend a preconceived message, is surprising even to me. The stink of intellectual corruption is overpowering. And, as Christopher Booker argues, this scandal is not at the margins of the politicised IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] process. It is not tangential to the policy prescriptions emanating from what David Henderson called the environmental policy milieu [subscription required]. It goes to the core of that process.

Nov 30 13:53

CLIMATEGATE - See who's visiting President Obama

Former Vice President Al Gore had four White House meetings in April. The records suggest these were not social calls for Gore, who won a Nobel Peace Prize for his work to curb global warming. Two of the meetings were with John Holdren, Obama’s top science and technology adviser.

Nov 30 13:50

Three Things You Absolutely Must Know About Climategate

This may seem obscure, but the science involved is being used to justify the diversion of literally trillions of dollars of the world’s wealth in order to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by phasing out fossil fuels. The CRU is the Pentagon of global warming science, and these documents are its Pentagon Papers.

Nov 30 13:35

Global warming? Don't wait up! The Earth has her own tricks to keep the carbon count in control

Perhaps it is comforting to believe that science is an absolute discipline: immune from fads, fanatics and frauds, untroubled by extremists, evangelists, glory-seekers and bigots. But it is not. It is as vulnerable to the vested interests and biases of its practitioners as any corporate entity or political party.

Uncomfortable truths are suppressed and dubious evidence given undue prominence.

Nowhere is this more worryingly obvious than in the science of climate change. As a field of research it has become so heavily politicised that opposing views are spoken of in terms of religion: believers and non-believers, with the accent being on the righteousness of the former and the benighted state of the latter.

Nov 30 13:27

CLIMATEGATE - Climate scientists: Dog ate homework

In the latest shocking development in climategate, scientists at the world's leading research facility studying climate change have admitted they threw out much of the raw temperature data on which they built their theory of man-made global warming.

The revelation in yesterday's London Sunday Times, reported by environment editor Jonathan Leake, means the original work that led to modern climate change theory developed at the now under fire Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of the U.K.'s University of East Anglia, cannot be independently verified by other academics, critical of CRU's methods.

They allege CRU manipulated data to exaggerate global warming, which it attributes to mankind's burning of fossil fuels.

Nov 30 13:24

CLIMATEGATE - Climate Conspiracy

Broadly speaking, this scandal will alter the burden of proof. From this point on, proponents of global warming theory will receive no benefit of the doubt. Wanton extrapolations, reliance on models in which data can be endlessly readjusted to fit the thesis, and attempts to stigmatize critics as scientifically illiterate will have to stop. Ad hominem attacks on critics suggesting that they are in the hire of “big oil” or other interests will be seen for the shabby evasions they always were. Let’s hope that the result of this scandal is a restoration of principled inquiry to an important public policy debate.

Nov 30 11:54

CLIMATEGATE - Geologist 'appalled' at NYT's Krugman: 'Legitimate scientists do not doctor data...hijack peer-review...send fraudulent data to UN that is used to perpetuate greatest hoax in the history of science'

Legitimate scientists do not 'provide false data to further legislation on climate change that will result in huge profits for corrupt lobbyists and politicians'

Nov 30 11:53

CLIMATEGATE - A betrayal of science - and of you

The now non-secret data prove what many of us had only strongly suspected — that most of the evidence of global warming was simply made up. That is, not only are the global warming computer models unreliable, the experimental data upon which these models are built are also unreliable. As Lord Monckton has emphasized here at Pajamas Media, this deliberate destruction of data and the making up of data out of whole cloth is the real crime — the real story of Climategate.

It is an act of treason against science. It is also an act of treason against humanity, since it has been used to justify an attempt to destroy the world economy.

Nov 30 11:49

CLIMATEGATE - RENEWED PROPAGANDA PUSH TO SELL COPENHAGEN

MOST of the world's population will be wiped out if political leaders fail to agree a method of stopping current rates of global warming, one of the UK's most senior climate scientists has warned.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Yep, when they start saying most of you will die if you do not do as you are told, it reeks of panic in the warmist camp.

Nov 30 11:48

Vincent Gray on Climategate: ‘There Was Proof of Fraud All Along’

Nothing about the revelations surprises me. I have maintained email correspondence with most of these scientists for many years, and I know several personally. I long ago realized that they were faking the whole exercise.

Nov 30 11:47

Climategate Story....Not Going Away

Dear Main Stream Media,

We know you are doing your best to cover this up. It is understandable, but very immoral. Instead of focusing on one of the biggest scientific scandals ever, and identifying the real scoundrels involved, you have given in to both corporate and governmental pressure. A lot of big companies pay you a great deal of money to advertise their products and they really want to continue the lies about the existence of global warming that they have helped perpetuate. Governments have their own shady agendas.

What you must understand is that WE THE PEOPLE are not letting this go! We will get the word out and we will make sure the truth is told, even if you stopped doing that long ago.

Nov 30 11:46

David Archibald on Climategate

As the Climategate emails show, the warmers captured the whole system – all the journals, all their editors and the journals’ boards. They successfully removed inconvenient editors. As a last line of defence, they were going to change the definition of what peer review meant. Making the system more prescriptive will simply entrench the corrupted establishment ...

Nov 30 11:44

ClimateGate scandal demonstrates intellectual protectionism of modern scientists

The inconvenient release of private email conversations among climate change scientists has been a boon for climate change skeptics. What emerges from the leaked emails is a depiction of a group of scientists who practice “intellectual protectionism” — meaning they know they’re right and they’ll do anything to protect their beliefs, even if it means hiding or manipulating data.

Sound familiar? Scientists in the pharmaceutical industry have been practicing this for decades. If you think the ClimateGate emails are revealing, just imagine what kind of similar emails are flying around between Big Pharma scientists who routinely manipulate study data and commit scientific fraud in the name of medicine.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Not in the name of medicine, in the name of profits! Same motive as Climategate!

Nov 30 11:34

Climategate: The Fallout Continues from CRU Hacking

The big issue: Just how reliable is the information that is at the heart of the climate center’s conclusions about global temperature trends? The CRU, for its part, stresses that
“our conclusions correlate well to those of other scientists based on the separate data sets held by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS).”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

If you have four sets of data that match, and one is a proven fake, then they are all fake.

Nov 30 10:52

Climategate: We Can ALL Agree On Two Things

Whatever you think about the leaked emails showing that "tricks" were used to "hide the decline" in the climate data, and the fact that the original source data showing historical climate information was destroyed, you should agree on two things.

Nov 30 10:39

CLIMATEGATE: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

Climategate may well prove to be the final fight in the war between those who would rule us with lies and those who wish to live with truth. Climategate makes it clear that yes, there really are massive conspiracies between government and the media to mislead the general public. You cannot pretend they don't exist; one is right there before you staked out naked on the ground, exposed for all to marvel at! I leave it as an exercise for the reader to decide how many other such deceptions form what we think we know of the world and of history.

Optional Banner: 
WRH Exclusive
Nov 30 10:25

CLIMATEGATE - EU President Admits One-World Government is Here - Copenhagen treaty a key piece.

Nov 30 10:21

Climategate: let the investigation begin

Webmaster's Commentary: 

And who gets to do this "investigation?" The same government behind the global warming/carbon tax agenda?

Is not the lesson of Climategate that we cannot trust the government and the media to be truthful with us all?

Was that not also the lesson of Saddam's Nookular" bombs?

When the government pisses down your back and calls it rain, do you obediently stand there without a raincoat for another dousing?

Nov 30 10:18

Ed Begley, Jr. Loses Control Over ClimateGate

Nov 30 10:04

CLIMATEGATE - Operation: Arrest the Crimatologists

Contest launched for most effective way of spreading the word about climategate.

Nov 30 09:30

CLIMATEGATE - FLASHBACK - Global warming: the chilling effect on free speech

The message is clear: climate change deniers are scum. Their words are so wicked and dangerous that they must be silenced, or criminalised, or forced beyond the pale alongside those other crackpots who claim there was no Nazi Holocaust against the Jews. Perhaps climate change deniers should even be killed off, hanged like those evil men who were tried Nuremberg-style the first time around.

Whatever the truth about our warming planet, it is clear there is a tidal wave of intolerance in the debate about climate change which is eroding free speech and melting rational debate.

Nov 30 09:27

FLASHBACK - CLIMATEGATE - Life Is Convenient When You Define 'Truth'

Activists have been much stronger in their language. “We should have war crimes trials for these bastards – some sort of climate Nuremberg,” wrote David Roberts of the environmentalist Grist Magazine, describing the climate change “denial industry.”

This is the world we live in, where some views are laughed out of news coverage and those who doubt weather forecasts a century into the future are linked rhetorically with mass murderers.

Since when did denying evidence of historical events become on par with questioning future political agendas?

Nov 30 09:19

The Web Discloses Inconvenient Climate Truths

For anyone who doubts the power of the Internet to shine light on darkness, the news of the month is how digital technology helped uncover a secretive group of scientists who suppressed data, froze others out of the debate, and flouted freedom-of-information laws. Their behavior was brought to light when more than 1,000 emails,and some 3,500 additional files were published online, many of which boasted about how they suppressed hard questions about their data.

The emails, released by an apparent whistle-blower who used the name "FOI," were written by scientists at the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in England. Its scientists are high-profile campaigners for the theory of global warming.

Nov 30 09:18

Rigging a Climate 'Consensus'

The climatologists at the center of the leaked email and document scandal have taken the line that it is all much ado about nothing. Yes, the wording of their messages was unfortunate, but they insist this in no way undermines the underlying science. They're ignoring the damage they've done to public confidence in the arbiters of climate science.

"What they've done is search through stolen personal emails—confidential between colleagues who often speak in a language they understand and is often foreign to the outside world," Penn State's Michael Mann told Reuters Wednesday. Mr. Mann added that this has made "something innocent into something nefarious."

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Here is a great example. "I can make it up. So I have" You can see how that could be misunderstood!!! :)

Nov 30 09:15

Climategate: Googlegate?

Nov 30 09:08

CLIMATEGATE - Flushing out the high priests of climate change

One of the most absurd moments came when George Monbiot of The Guardian, a columnist normally strident in his view that climate change is the most important problem facing mankind, appointed himself judge, jury and executioner and called for Phil Jones, head of the research unit, to resign.

Well, he doesn't need to resign yet. We need to know whether the unit has done anything wrong, which an independent review set up by the university will examine.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

apparently "proved" that scientists had colluded to hide the fact that man-made global warming is a con.

Nigel Lawson's new think tank of sceptics and its outlying cavalry of angry bloggers and man-made global warming deniers furiously spurring on the debate.

See if you can figure out the bias this writer has on the subject! :)

Nov 30 08:46

What's the carbon/health footprint of another senseless war?

The Afghan War may now doom our ability both to cope with the global climate crisis and to fairly deliver health care in this country.

If Barack Obama announces an escalation, Copenhagen and the Climate Bill will become meaningless. And the prospects for a single-payer health care system or even a token public option will disappear.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

You know, if the Global Warming Cult were really all that serious about carbon dioxide and global warming, don't you think they would make a huge stink about cutting down several million photosynthesizing trees every winter for Holiday decorations, most of which get chopped up and burned in the fireplace, thereby producing vast clouds of CO2?

You don't hear that, do you? The Cultist's ONLY solution to the "problem" is to demand your money and obedience.

Kind of gives the game away right there, doesn't it?

Nov 30 08:42

Climategate: how the MSM reported the greatest scandal in modern science

"Here, the expected 1990-2003 period is MISSING – so the correlations aren’t so hot! Yet the WMO codes and station names /locations are identical (or close). What the hell is
supposed to happen here? Oh yeah – there is no ’supposed’, I can make it up. So I have :)" -- Actual CRU email (emphasis added)

Nov 30 08:40

CLIMATEGATE - Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science

The East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) revelations come as no real surprise to anyone who has closely followed the global-warming saga. The Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) thesis, to give it its semi-official name, is no stranger to fraud. It is no real exaggeration to state that it was fertilized with fraud, marinated in fraud, stewed in fraud, and at last served up to the world as prime, grade-A fraud with nice side orders of fakery and disingenuousness. Damning as they may be, the CRU e-mails are merely the climactic element in an exhaustively long line.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Climategate is NOT merely a science scandal. It is a political scandal. The scientists were wrong to do what they did, but they only did what they were paid to do by those above them.

Go for the ringleaders!

Nov 30 08:38

CLIMATEGATE - Green Global Dictatorship: Regional Governance, UN Agenda 21, Sustainable Development, and the Wildlands Project

In “Diplomatic Immunity for the Sierra Club?” (http://www.bitterroot.com/grizzly/coffman.htm), Dr. Coffman notes that when President Clinton signed Executive Order 12986 in 1996, he extended diplomatic immunity to the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature). This means no lawsuits can be brought by Americans against the IUCN. Coffman asks the question: Since the Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy, etc. are members of the IUCN, does this give them diplomatic immunity from lawsuits as well?

Nov 30 08:11

Search Engines Censoring ClimateGate?

A fantastic article written by Christopher Brooker of the London Telegraph exposing the climate change fraud rocketed to the very top of a Google News search for “global warming,” only to disappear hours later.

“What is going on at Google? I only ask because last night when I typed “Global Warming” into Google News the top item was Christopher Booker’s superb analysis of the Climategate scandal,” writes James Delingpole.

“It’s still the most-read article of the Telegraph’s entire online operation – 430 comments and counting – yet mysteriously when you try the same search now it doesn’t even feature. Instead, the top-featured item is a blogger pushing Al Gore’s AGW agenda. Perhaps there’s nothing sinister in this. Perhaps some Google-savvy reader can enlighten me.”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

As I mentioned last eek, there are billions of dollars on the line for the carbon traders and trillions in global taxes on the line for the UN< plus the justification for the UN to take over control of national infrastructure.

The globalists have been at work on this plan since the late 1980s. There is nothing, and I do mean nothing to protect their agenda and the promise of wealth beyond Midas!

No crime will be too extreme, no lie too bold, no sabotage too hateful to carry out, if it serves the New World Order.

Nov 30 08:06

European Climate Exchange chief Patrick Birley defends the carbon trading system

Webmaster's Commentary: 

"Of course it's a great idea! Look how much money I am making off of this scam!!!" -- The Goracle

Nov 30 07:56

Leaked emails won't harm UN climate body, says chairman

Rajendra Pachauri says there is 'virtually no possibility' of a few scientists biasing IPCC's advice, after UAE hacking breach.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

"Just because we predicted warm, and we are getting record cold is no reason to suspect us!!!!!!!!"

(Ahem)

It is NOT a "few scientists" biasing the IPCC. It is the other way around.

IPCC is not a scientific organization. It is a political one. It was formed by the UN in the late 1980s to allow the burgeoning global bureaucracy to deal with the emerging global problem. BUt the bureaucrats were in charge from day one.

Both the 1990 and 1995 assessments by the IPCC scientists stated that it would be almost impossible to determine exactly what role human contributions contributed to climate, although most agreed that in theory there had to be one.

But in 1995, after the scientists were done, the IPCC bureaucrats changed the assessment wording. They removed the comments that stated that the scientists still could not detect the human contribution to climate and replaced it with a claim that thew human contribution was now discernible and a cause for IPCC action. In short, while the IPCC scientists were saying they could not find evidence that humans were changing the climate in 1995, the IPPC officially said exactly the opposite!

There followed an intense period of funding for scientists willing to study human caused global warming, which meant the money flowed to those scientists willing to accept that major premise as fact. As the leaked emails from CRU document, scientists with opposing views were defunded and blocked from publication. That is not science at work; that is politics.

Climategate is a political scandal, not a scientific one.

Nov 30 07:24

U.S. journalist grilled at Canada border crossing

U.S. journalist Amy Goodman said she was stopped at a Canadian border crossing south of Vancouver on Wednesday and questioned for 90 minutes by authorities concerned she was coming to Canada to speak against the Olympics.

Goodman says Canadian Border Services Agency officials ultimately allowed her to enter Canada but returned her passport with a document demanding she leave the country within 48 hours.

Nov 30 07:04

Leaked climate change emails 'won't bias UN global warning body' says chairman

The BBC has previously accused of failing to cover the climate change debate objectively. Earlier this year, Peter Sisson, the veteran newsreader, claimed it is now "effectively BBC policy" to stifle critics of the consensus view on global warming.

He said: "The Corporation's most famous interrogators invariably begin by accepting that "the science is settled", when there are countless reputable scientists and climatologists producing work that says it isn't.

"But it is effectively BBC policy... that those views should not be heard."

Nov 29 16:50

CLIMATEGATE - NOAA CAUGHT FUDGING THE CLIMATE DATA!

Yes, that is correct. Nearly all the reported warming in the USHCN data base, which is used for nearly all global warming studies and models, is from human-added fudge factors, guesstimates, and corrections.

I know what you are thinking – this is some weird skeptic’s urban legend. Well, actually it comes right from the NOAA web page which describes how they maintain the USHCN data set. Below is the key chart from that site showing the sum of all the plug factors and corrections they add to the raw USHCN measurements:

Nov 29 15:59

Climategate: Have They No Shame?

It is clear that the tip-top scientists implicated in the burgeoning Climategate scandal have no honor, but it is also becoming apparent that they have no sense of shame either. Their strategy is to brazen it out and rely on the great global warming alarmist establishment and the mainstream media to circle the wagons. They have got their talking point and the environmental pressure groups are already repeating it over and over: “The ‘global warming deniers’ are cherry-picking a few unfortunately worded emails and then taking them out of context.” Well, they are some pretty big, juicy cherries and there are a lots of them.

Nov 29 15:55

Climate change data dumped

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

Nov 29 14:53

Stephanopoulos: ClimateGate Complicates Copenhagen for Obama

As NewsBusters has been reporting since this story broke more than a week ago, television news outlets have been quite disinterested in the controversy now growing with each passing day.

Breaking this trend, Stephanopoulos aggressively waded into this seemingly verboten subject by mentioning how it complicates President Obama's trip to "Copenhagen to deal with climate change."

Webmaster's Commentary: 

"Complicate?" Climategate should stop Copenhagen dead in its tracks!

Nov 29 14:45

Climate Change Bill Faces Delays In Senate

In early December, world leaders will gather in Copenhagen to begin talks on a new treaty to curb greenhouse gases and global warming. President Obama will attend the summit.

In urging action on climate change, the president says it's essential "that all countries do what is necessary to reach a strong operational agreement that will confront the threat of climate change while serving as a stepping stone to a legally binding treaty."

White House officials say the U.S. will propose targets for reducing greenhouse gases in line with what Congress is considering. But while the House narrowly passed a climate change bill last summer, no action by the Senate is expected until next spring.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Knowing what we know now, the House (Ms. Pelosi) are looking like a right bunch of useful idiots.

Nov 29 14:41

ClimateGate Link O'rama

Nov 29 13:08

Glenn Harlan Reynolds: Climategate denial foundering on army of Davids

Last week a hacker -- or, perhaps more likely, an inside "whistleblower" -- leaked huge amounts of data from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University in Britain. The leaks demonstrated that many "insider" scientists were conspiring to block publication of dissenting views in peer-reviewed journals, while suggesting that there was data-fudging, and deliberate evasion of Freedom Of Information requests, perhaps even including deliberate destruction of data.

Worse still, the computer models themselves appear to be jerry-rigged and deeply flawed.

Nov 29 12:32

Significance of “Climategate” Deciphered

So what is all the excitement with the documents that hackers pulled off the computers of the scientists who published the data on which global warming theories are based? The short answer is: the data was corrupt, mismanaged, and manipulated. The bigger issue, though, is the idea that the core people working to prove man-made global warming KNEW this to be true and toiled in their emails to one another about what to do about the fact that the research data was not supporting their theories. That, my friends, is the big deal here.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Waterboard them! :)

Nov 29 12:30

A Convenient Ruse: Man-Made Global Warming Data Destroyed

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

So whatever data CRU announces they will release in the future HAS TO BE MADE UP.

i.e. a new set of phony claims.

Nov 29 12:24

CLIMATEGATE - FLASHBACK - Greenpeace Leader Admits Arctic Ice Exaggeration

Nov 29 11:59

Falsi cation Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse E ects Within The Frame Of Physics

In this paper the popular conjecture is analyzed and the underlying
physical principles are clari ed. By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the ctitious atmospheric green-house e ffects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature
of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned di erence of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsi ed.

Nov 29 11:53

CLIMATEGATE: A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY

We have collected together a vast body of evidence calling into question the legitimacy of the claims of human cause global warming. We have collected together a vast body of evidence proving fraud and deception on the part of the global warming cult. Please for this information to everybody you know in times of the essence. Barack Obama as already indicated that he will not be swayed by the exposure of the fraud in the CRU/NWIA data, and fully intends to go to Copenhagen to sign away our national sovereignty as penance for our contribution to global warming.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

I have collected together my concerns about Climategate into this one article. It documents that rulers lie to their people and have done so for thousands of years, and that Climategate is just the latest in a long series of lies to trick you out of money and freedom.

I know this is a long read, but I think I have put together a case for saying that the info-war over Climategate could be a turning point in the history of humankind.

Whether it will prove to be so is entirely up to you.

Optional Banner: 
WRH Exclusive
Nov 29 09:09

Climategate: The BBC is still pretending not to notice

Most believers in AGW (who I accept include the majority of scientists in this field) acknowledge the significance of the Climategate scandal, breaking as it has on the eve of the Copenhagen summit. But the BBC is holding firm, providing far less than the bare minimum of coverage that licence payers have a right to expect.

Nov 29 09:02

CLIMATEGATE - John Holdren contributed to "inconvienent truth" and Climategate

Lets start with Al Gore's "inconvenient truth", turns out the truth was inconvenient, so inconvenient they had to mess with the data and make the entire global warming scam to be the inconvenient lie. In 2006 Al Gore had a bit of help making his movie, that help came from John Holdren that contributed data to the movie. We all know what happens to that data or rather what happened to that data.

Nov 29 08:57

Climategate: 'The stones cry out'

The extraordinary revelation of Climategate through the alternative media the world over raises provocative questions about the health of Western notions of truth, science, and intellectual freedom .

Nov 29 08:55

Climate Science Fraud at Albany University?

Professor Wei-Chyung Wang is a star scientist in the Atmospheric Sciences Research Center at the University at Albany, New York. He is a key player in the climate change debate (see his self-description here). Wang has been accused of scientific fraud.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

In short, during the time Professor Wei-Chyung Wang insisted that the temperature monitoring stations he collected data from were being left alone, the real data shows they were being moved around to different places at different times.

Nov 29 08:50

Al Gore’s Science Fiction: A Skeptic’s Guide to An Inconvenient Truth

Nov 29 08:47

Scenes from the Climate Inquisition

On February 2, an AEI research project on climate change policy that we have been organizing was the target of a journalistic hit piece in Britain's largest left-wing newspaper, the Guardian. The article's allegation--that we tried to bribe scientists to criticize the work of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)--is easy to refute. More troubling is the growing worldwide effort to silence anyone with doubts about the catastrophic warming scenario that Al Gore and other climate extremists are putting forth.

Nov 29 08:43

Obama's 'Cardiff Giant'

Despite what appears evidence of outright fraud, President Obama refuses to acknowledge, no less investigate, what is increasingly becoming known as "The World's Greatest Hoax." Obama's intentions to go off to Copenhagen, pretending that "the science is settled," is a political gaffe of enormous proportion. It puts whatever is left of his rapidly diminishing credibility at risk, as well as his agenda.

Nov 29 08:35

Climate change denier Nick Griffin to represent EU at Copenhagen

Last night politicians and scientists reacted furiously to news that the far-right politician and climate change denier should be attending the summit on behalf of the EU.

Nov 29 08:34

Hacked E-Mail Data Prompts Calls for Changes in Climate Research

The scientists say that the e-mail messages, which have circulated on the Internet and which disclose the inner workings of a small network of climatologists who chart the planet’s temperature, have damaged the public’s trust in the evidence that humans are dangerously warming the planet, just as many countries are poised to start reining in greenhouse gas emissions.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The NY Times is avoiding the real issues. Human-Caused Global Warming is being used to sell us all a carbon tax, which will drive up the cost of goods and services even more than they are already.

Al Gore and his investors stand to make billions of dollars in a financial fraud on a scale to make Bernie Madoff look like he pilfered the coffee fund form the office.

Government's gladly got on board this carbon tax because they will collect trillions of dollars to fix a problem that does not exist, which means they can spend the money on whatever else they feel like.

And behind it all is the agenda to trick the people of planet Earth into accepting the yoke of a global oligarchy "for their own good".

This NY Times article totally avoids the question of whether the evidence that supports the claim of anthropogenic global warming is worth any trust. Isn't that really the heart of the CRU leaked emails; that the pretty charts and graphs are worthless? Yet to read the NY Times article, it appears their spin is that regardless of how many scientists were caught rigging the data, the issue still remains beyond any doubt.

Nov 29 08:17

Climategate: A Reality Check on Climate Change

Webmaster's Commentary: 

There will be a larger and more comprehensive article out later today. Stay tuned!

Optional Banner: 
WRH Exclusive
Nov 29 08:04

CLIMATEGATE - FLASHBACK - Jail politicians who ignore climate science: Suzuki

At a Montreal conference last Thursday, the prominent scientist, broadcaster and Order of Canada recipient exhorted a packed house of 600 to hold politicians legally accountable for what he called an intergenerational crime.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Now that the data behind the claims of human-caused global warming has been discredited and proven to be a manufactured fraud, I wonder if Suzuki will call for jail for the fraudsters?

After all, the crime here involves financial profit by deception, and is there really any difference between what Al Gore did and Bernie Madoff did?

Nov 29 05:00

A History of Money and Banking Secrets That Banks Don't Want Published

A History of Money and Banking Secrets That Banks Don't Want Published

A History of Money and Trade

To start with a history of money and debt, we must go back many years ago when people used to trade their wares for the things they wanted and needed.

In place of money or Federal Reserve Notes, you could trade a well made pistol for a cow, which you could eat or trade a remainder of for other items like clothing.

It didn't take long for people to realize there needed to be a more efficient means of trade. If you were a farmer, it was too difficult to carry baskets of fresh corn around to trade for a new horse. And, the person selling the horse might not want any corn at all.

Nov 28 21:54

CLIMATEGATE - FLASHBACK - Gore Urges Scientist to Change Science to Suit His Alarmist Agenda

The Newsweek article states:

"If we feed the biology and manage grasslands appropriately, we could sequester as much carbon as we emit," says Timothy LaSalle, CEO of the Rodale Institute, who presented at two summits. The political clash is this: if you tell people soils can be managed to suck up lots of our carbon emissions, it sounds like a get-out-of-jail-free card, and could decrease what little enthusiasm there is for reducing those emissions—as one of Gore's assistants told LaSalle in asking him to dial down his estimate. (He didn't.)

Nov 28 16:54

CLIMATEGATE - GOOGLE PULLS "CLIMATEGATE" OUT OF THEIR AUTOSUGGESTION LIST!

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Funny, it was there just a moment ago! :)

Nov 28 16:40

Who's to blame for Climategate?

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Who paid the scientists?

Nov 28 16:32

The great climate change science scandal

What those emails suggested, however, was that Jones and some colleagues may have become so convinced of their case that they crossed the line from objective research into active campaigning.

In one, Jones boasted of using statistical “tricks” to obliterate apparent declines in global temperature. In another he advocated deleting data rather than handing them to climate sceptics. And in a third he proposed organised boycotts of journals that had the temerity to publish papers that undermined the message.

It was a powerful and controversial mix — far too powerful for some. Real Climate is a website designed for scientists who share Jones’s belief in man-made climate change. Within hours the file had been stripped from the site.

Nov 28 16:28

Climategate: University of East Anglia U-turn in climate change row

In a statement welcomed by climate change sceptics, the university said it would make all the data accessible as soon as possible, once its Climatic Research Unit (CRU) had negotiated its release from a range of non-publication agreements.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Given that CRU admitted last August to have DISPOSED OF THE RAW DATA, and given the email and software proof of deception, why would anyone trust anything more to come out of that building?

Nov 28 16:22

Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation

Our hopelessly compromised scientific establishment cannot be allowed to get away with the Climategate whitewash, says Christopher Booker

Webmaster's Commentary: 

This is just more of the same "scapegoat the scientists" propaganda.

Climategate is not a scientific scandal, it is a political one, and more than that, it is a crime against humanity!

Nov 28 16:21

Mark Steyn: Cooking the books on climate

My favorite moment in the Climategate/Climaquiddick scandal currently roiling the "climate change" racket was Stuart Varney's interview on Fox News with the actor Ed Begley Jr., star of the 1980s medical drama "St Elsewhere" but latterly better known, as is the fashion with members of the thespian community, as an "activist." He's currently in a competition with Bill Nye ("the Science Guy") to see who can have the lowest "carbon footprint." Pistols at dawn would seem the quickest way of resolving that one, but presumably you couldn't get a reality series out of it.

Nov 28 16:13

CLIMATEGATE - Hudson Hushed

Paul Hudson, the BBC weatherman who in October was forwarded some of the Climategate emails (those relating to his article "What happened to global warming?") has been gagged by the BBC.

Nov 28 15:15

The IPCC can't count its "Expert Scientists": Author and Reviewer Numbers are Wrong

How many times have you heard or read words to the effect that 4000 scientists from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change (IPCC) supported the claims about a significant human influence on climate? I think I've seen it on television, radio and the Internet and I know that politicians at national levels have quoted such figures. There's no question whatsoever. It's utterly wrong.

Nov 28 15:03

At NYT's Dot Earth: Young Scientist 'Disheartened' by Climategate; Core Problems Ignored

What's notably lacking in Revkin's report, Curry's letter, and many other Climategate-related establishment media reports is any willingness to entertain the notion that the scandal completely undermines the scientific basis for the argument that AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is occurring.

It seems that no one will dare say that the pathetic state of the data described in the leaked e-mails and the demonstrated willingness of those who control it to massage it hollows out the entire core of the AGW argument. As I understand it there is no other comparable data set.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

Here is the reality of what is going on.

Those people still supporting AGW (anthropogenic global warming) are dependent on funding to support their current positions. That funding is in turn dependent in the continuation of faith that AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is correct. After all, when Galileo proved that the Earth Orbited the Sun, funding for continued research into epicycles vanished abruptly, along with tenures and the value of every degree issued in the field of Epicycles.

The same applies here. With precious rare exception, every academic whose degree and funding is based on AGW (anthropogenic global warming) is looking at a stark unemployment picture. In their minds, they are not fighting for scientific truth; they are fighting for their livelihood, and the proof is very simple. If their primary concern was really the long term welfare of planet Earth, one would think the Global Warming Cult would be delighted to find out there really is no danger after all. But, as is clearly evident, the goal is to support the orthodoxy even against the revelation that their core scientific foundation is based on a fraud.

Quite a few people, including President Obama, are financially invested in the Global Carbon Credit scheme, in which licenses are issued to pollute, with the surplus units bought and sold through brokerages. Al Gore and his fellow investors have already spent $150 million to "sell" anthropogenic global warming. They will not walk away from that investment easily.

Beyond the researchers whose degrees and funding are dependent on the continuation of a perceived public threat, the media outlets and government officials who signed onto this campaign are now realizing that they have wagered their entire credibility on AGW (anthropogenic global warming) at a time when their credibility was already strained from Saddam's "nookular" bombs, the economy, 9-11, etc. etc. etc. Climategate could well be the final nail in the coffin of the public's trust of media and government.

And looming over all of this is the push for a global government, which rested one third of their justification on the need for a global environmental authority to "solve" the problem of those icky humans messing up the globe.

There is a vast amount of personal reputation, money, and power on the line here. Climategate is the start of a major fight for the truth, one which if won will see the end of many well-known institutions of government and media.

Nov 28 13:01

Why it's impossible to support the war in Afghanistan

It's been eight years since the United States invaded Afghanistan. After all these years many Americans have lost sight of the alleged purpose of our invasion - to hunt for Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda.

What has also been lost is any government inquiry whatsoever into the accuracy of the "smoking gun" evidence that the Bush Administration presented as the final justification for invading Afghanistan - the peculiar "Osama bin Laden confession video".

Nov 28 10:34

Obama, Maurice Strong, Al Gore key players cashing in on Chicago Climate Exchange

“Obama Years Ago Helped Fund Carbon Program He Is Now Pushing Through Congress” is a FOXNews story by Ed Barnes. In short, “While on the board of a Chicago-based charity, Barack Obama helped fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the cap-and-trade carbon reduction program he is now trying to push through Congress as president.”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

In other words, when Obama goes to Copenhagen and signs away your money and your freedoms, he is putting much of that money into his own pockets.

This is why going after the CRU and IPCC scientists is a diversion. The real crooks are the politicians.

Nov 28 10:31

UN scientists turn on each other: UN Scientist Declares Climategate colleagues Mann, Jones and Rahmstorf ’should be barred from the IPCC process’ — They are ‘not credible any more’

A UN scientist is declaring that his three fellow UN climate panel colleagues “should be barred from the IPCC process.” In a November 26, 2009 message on his website, UN IPCC contributing author Dr. Eduardo Zorita writes: “CRU files: Why I think that Michael Mann, Phil Jones and Stefan Rahmstorf should be barred from the IPCC process.”

Webmaster's Commentary: 

What is going on here is obvious. The entire Global Government agenda is hanging by its neck from the Climategate Noose and the rush is on to find someone to blame it all on in the hopes that if enough small fry are sacrificed in flames before the mob, that the agenda itself can still be saved even if it is delayed.

Well, I for one will not be satisfied with a few servile scientists pilloried for doing what they were paid to do.

I want the ringleaders.

I want the masterminds.

I want the entire machine of the fraud from government through media down to the scientists fully exposed to public view

Nov 28 10:23

global warming alarmism, climatologist tim ball debunks man made Co2 myths

Nov 28 10:04

CLIMATEGATE - When the Press Favors Secrecy

Here's a dirty little secret about The New York Times: It likes to leak things. Important things. Things that change the course of the public conversation. From the Pentagon Papers to the ruined terrorist-surveillance programs of the Bush era, the Times has routinely found that secrecy is a danger and sunlight is a disinfectant.

Until now. A troublesome hacker recently released e-mails going to and from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia in Britain, e-mails that exposed how the "scientific experts" cited so often by the media on global warming are guilty of crude political talk, attempts at censoring opponents and twisting scientific data to support their policy agenda.

Nov 28 10:01

Phil Jones has collected a staggering $22.6 million in grants

"So far, the most interesting file I found in the "documents" directory is pdj_grant_since1990.xls which shows that since 1990, Phil Jones has collected a staggering 13.7 million British pounds ($22.6 million) in grants.

Webmaster's Commentary: 

The real criminal mastermind of Climategate is whoever signed those grant checks!

SHARE THIS ARTICLE WITH YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA